8th ANNUAL REPORT CARD
2005-2006
The Board of Education, administration, and faculty of Broken Bow Public Schools present the Eighth Annual Broken Bow Public Schools Report Card.
The 8th Annual Report Card is composed of four parts:
Part I – District Information – an overview of Broken Bow Schools.
Part II – Results from the Terra Nova and ACT – standardized group tests administered to various groups of Broken Bow students.
Part III – Results from State Writing Assessments grades 4, 8 and 11, State Math and Reading Assessments grades 4, 8 and 11, and School District Accountability in Math and Reading grades 4, 8, and 11.
Part IV – Results of an annual survey given to graduating seniors each spring.
It is our desire that this report card gives the reader an in-depth understanding of the efforts undertaken at Broken Bow Schools to improve our educational system so that all our students are well prepared for the challenges following high school.
Timothy B. Shafer, Ph.D.
Superintendent of Schools
Broken Bow Public Schools is a Nebraska Class III School District. The district consists of six educational sites: SESC Preschool at Tappan Valley – pre-kindergarten, North Park – grades kindergarten through two, Custer – grades three through five, Round Hill – grades kindergarten – six, the Middle School – grades six through eight, and the High School – grades nine through twelve.
The Broken Bow District covers approximately 426 square miles in Custer County. The economic base for the county is mainly agriculture and agriculture based industries. The racial/ethnic make-up of the Broken Bow District is almost exclusively Caucasian (White, non-Hispanic).
The school district currently runs 7 regular bus routes and has 128 students who could be transported each day. State law requires that transportation be provided to students living 4 miles or more from the student's attendance center. The regular bus routes cover approximately 550 miles per day or around 107,000 miles per year. In addition approximately 68,000 miles a year are driven on activity trips.
Numerous community programs and parent organizations encourage and support the Broken Bow District.
The Broken Bow Public Schools will provide learning experiences for all students to obtain knowledge about and respect for the diversity and commonalities of the cultures, histories and contributions of African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, Native-Americans, and Asian-Americans. Multicultural education promoting student awareness and sensitivity will be infused into the curriculum in all areas and all grades. (Information from Curriculum Guide)
The School Improvement Committee is an on-going, student-focused school improvement process organized around four district goals and two NCA goals. An integral part of School Improvement is accreditation. Broken Bow Public Schools is an accredited member of North Central Association (NCA) and has been continuously accredited by the NCA since 1915. A task force works year-round on projects associated with each goal.
District Goals
1. Caring About Self & Others - Students will improve their responsibility and respect for others. They will also improve motivation.
2. Safety – Students will be aware of the district-wide safety plan and actively participate in it.
3. Career Preparation - Students will have the skills to make knowledgeable decisions regarding their post-secondary goals.
4. Technology – Students will improve in their use of media and technology.
NCA Goals
Academic Achievement – Student data will be analyzed to make informed decisions about programs and student progress.
Communications – Members will work to ensure that:
1. All K-12 students will improve performance in writing skills across the curriculum.
Financial (2004-2005)
Average Cost Per Pupil Daily Membership
District $7624.85
State $8013.02
Average Cost Per Pupil Daily Attendance
District $7969.25
State $8468.22
2005-06 Value of Buildings & Contents $14,366,142
(Information from 2005-06 Annual Financial Report)
2005-06 Average Daily Enrollment 833.65
(Average number of students enrolled for the entire school year)
2005-06 Average Daily Attendance 797.20
(Average number of students in attendance each day)
Average Daily Attendance Rate 95.7%
(Information from 2005-06 Annual Financial Report)
Graduation Rate
2005-06 District Rate 97.30%
2005-06 State Rate 88.76%
(Most current information from 2005-06 State of the Schools Report)
Drop-out Rate
2004-2005 District Rate 0.00%
2004-2005 State Rate 1.86%
(Most current information from 2005-06 State of the Schools Report)
Student Option Enrollment In 47
Student Option Enrollment Out 29
(Information from District Office)
Student Characteristics
Eligible for Free and Reduced Priced Meals
District Average 40.55%
State Average 34.64%
Moving In or Out During the School Year
District Average 6.61%
State Average 13.77%
Learning the English Language
District Average 0%
State Average 6.17%
Receiving Special Education Services
District Average 18.39%
State Average 15.21%
(Information from 2005-06 State of the Schools Report)
Grade-by-Grade Enrollment
Grade |
Year |
||||
1990-1991 |
1995-1996 |
2000-2001 |
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
|
PK |
5 |
8 |
15 |
37 |
36 |
K |
85 |
63 |
62 |
48 |
67 |
1 |
76 |
77 |
59 |
58 |
44 |
2 |
67 |
69 |
65 |
64 |
54 |
3 |
67 |
44 |
70 |
56 |
61 |
4 |
64 |
65 |
64 |
71 |
58 |
5 |
84 |
87 |
66 |
58 |
69 |
6 |
79 |
78 |
79 |
64 |
54 |
7 |
77 |
67 |
76 |
72 |
65 |
8 |
73 |
67 |
52 |
73 |
69 |
9 |
74 |
70 |
78 |
66 |
73 |
10 |
78 |
89 |
84 |
73 |
68 |
11 |
75 |
82 |
75 |
77 |
71 |
12 |
57 |
61 |
70 |
53 |
79 |
Total |
961 |
927 |
915 |
870 |
868 |
K-6 grades 13 – 1
7-12 grades 14 – 1
(Information from District Office)
Number of Professional Staff 79
Professional Staff Advanced Degrees
Ph.D. 1
Ed.S. 1
Masters Degree 35
(Information from District Office)
Sick Leave Days 149 1.0%
Personal Leave Days 576 3.9%
Staff Development Activity Days 272 1.9%
School Sponsored Activity Days 212 1.5%
(Information from Official District report to NDE)
PART II
ACHIEVEMENT TEST SCORES
The Broken Bow School District Administered the Terra Nova to students in grades 4, 8, and 11 to (1) assist in the identification of students in need of special assistance, (2) assess individual student achievement in comparison to national test results, (3) assist in instructional program assessment, and (4) meet Nebraska State Standards.
Test results are recorded in the form of a score called a “National Percentile Quarter Percents.” The top quarter percentile scores range from 76-99. The second quarter percentiles range from 51-75. The third quarter percentiles range from 26-50. The fourth quarter percentiles range from 1-25.
The number under each heading is the percent of Broken Bow students scoring in that particular quartile. Broken Bow Custer Elementary, Middle School, and High School students recorded the following “National Percentile Quarter Percents” scored during the 2004-05 school year and the 2005-06 school year:
4th Grade Scores
|
National Percentile Quarter Percents |
Reading |
Language |
Math |
Science |
Social Studies |
Total Score |
||||||
|
04-05 |
05-06 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
|
|
76-99 |
33 |
32 |
27 |
31 |
39 |
34 |
36 |
34 |
43 |
44 |
34 |
36 |
|
51-75 |
31 |
27 |
37 |
32 |
30 |
37 |
36 |
37 |
36 |
25 |
34 |
34 |
|
26-50 |
28 |
34 |
21 |
29 |
22 |
22 |
21 |
22 |
19 |
20 |
22 |
22 |
|
1-25 |
7 |
7 |
15 |
8 |
9 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
1 |
10 |
9 |
8 |
For example, in 2004-05, 33% of the Broken Bow 4th grade students taking the Terra Nova Test scored in the top quarter percentile in reading, when compared to students in the nation. 31% scored in the 2nd quarter, 28% scored in the 3rd quarter and 7% scored in the 4th quarter. 64% of Broken Bow students scored above the 50th percentile in reading, when compared with students in the nation.
The same format of the example above applies to the 8th grade and 11th grade charts below.
8th Grade Scores
|
National Percentile Quarter Percents |
Reading |
Language |
Math |
Science |
Social Studies |
Total Score |
||||||
|
04-05 |
05-06 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
|
|
76-99 |
32 |
35 |
28 |
25 |
28 |
51 |
42 |
48 |
37 |
35 |
30 |
39 |
|
51-75 |
37 |
30 |
35 |
32 |
42 |
23 |
30 |
30 |
27 |
28 |
41 |
30 |
|
26-50 |
24 |
27 |
27 |
27 |
23 |
13 |
18 |
10 |
27 |
24 |
23 |
20 |
|
1-25 |
7 |
8 |
10 |
15 |
7 |
14 |
10 |
13 |
8 |
13 |
7 |
11 |
11th Grade Scores
|
National Percentile Quarter Percents |
Reading |
Language |
Math |
Science |
Social Studies |
Total Score |
||||||
|
04-05 |
05-06 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
|
|
76-99 |
40 |
35 |
29 |
37 |
36 |
46 |
41 |
44 |
35 |
37 |
37 |
41 |
|
51-75 |
32 |
35 |
31 |
34 |
41 |
31 |
27 |
29 |
32 |
34 |
39 |
34 |
|
26-50 |
20 |
18 |
25 |
15 |
13 |
16 |
23 |
15 |
25 |
15 |
16 |
15 |
|
1-25 |
8 |
12 |
15 |
16 |
9 |
7 |
9 |
12 |
8 |
15 |
8 |
10 |
ACT SCORES
The following is information provided to the district on ACT scores and trends. This is a 5-year trend for ACT-tested students broken out by students taking core classes and students taking non-core classes.
The core classes are as follows:
English (Four years or more) Mathematics (Three years or more)
Social Studies (Three years or more) Natural Science (Three years or more)
Students taking non-core classes then do not have the recommended number of years of study in the identified courses.
Average ACT Scores by Level of Preparation
|
Average ACT Scores |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Number of Students Tested |
Percent |
English |
Mathematics |
Reading |
Science |
Composite |
|||||||
|
Grad Year |
Core or More |
Less than Core |
Core or More |
Less than Core |
Core or More |
Less than Core |
Core or More |
Less than Core |
Core or More |
Less than Core |
Core or More |
Less than Core |
Core or More |
Less than Core |
|
2002 |
23 |
31 |
43 |
57 |
22.8 |
18.3 |
23.9 |
18.5 |
23.4 |
19.1 |
23.3 |
19.1 |
23.5 |
19.0 |
|
2003 |
35 |
22 |
59 |
37 |
21.6 |
18.3 |
22.3 |
18.5 |
22.9 |
19.4 |
22.3 |
19.9 |
22.3 |
19.2 |
|
2004 |
19 |
26 |
39 |
53 |
22.2 |
19.1 |
23.7 |
18.6 |
23.3 |
20.3 |
22.4 |
20.3 |
22.9 |
19.7 |
|
2005 |
12 |
15 |
43 |
54 |
21.7 |
18.9 |
23.8 |
18.9 |
24.2 |
19.1 |
21.9 |
19.1 |
23.0 |
19.2 |
|
2006 |
14 |
33 |
28 |
66 |
22.5 |
19.7 |
22.4 |
20.1 |
23.7 |
22.0 |
22.1 |
20.2 |
22.8 |
20.6 |
PART III
The Statewide Math and Reading Assessment results show the percentage of students in grades 4, 8 and 11 who are proficient or better on the Nebraska Math and Reading Standards.


SCHOOL DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY
Math STARS 2005 – 2006
To meet State Accountability requirements, school districts and buildings must receive Good, Very Good or Exemplary ratings on both the quality of their assessments and the performance of students on standards.
At least 95 percent of the students must have been assessed in reading, mathematics and writing.
|
|
|
Unacceptable |
Acceptable But Needs Improvement |
Good |
Very Good |
Exemplary |
Students Assessed |
|
Grade 4 |
Assessment Quality |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Students Meeting Standards |
|
|
|
|
X |
98.21% |
|
Grade 8 |
Assessment Quality |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Students Meeting Standards |
|
|
|
|
X |
98.38% |
|
Grade 11 |
Assessment Quality |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Students Meeting Standards |
|
|
|
X |
|
95.02% |
Reading 2005 – 2006
|
|
|
Unacceptable |
Acceptable But Needs Improvement |
Good |
Very Good |
Exemplary |
Students Assessed |
|
Grade 4 |
Assessment Quality |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Students Meeting Standards |
|
|
|
|
X |
99.37% |
|
Grade 8 |
Assessment Quality |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Students Meeting Standards |
|
|
|
|
X |
87.46% |
|
Grade 11 |
Assessment Quality |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Students Meeting Standards |
|
|
|
X |
|
94.37% |
SCHOOL DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY
No Child Left Behind 2005 – 2006
To meet federal accountability requirements, school districts and buildings with 30 or more students in any of nine groups must meet the following federal accountability goals:
Student Performance: Reading 4th Grade
|
|
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
||
|
Student Groups |
Performance |
Participation |
Performance |
Participation |
|
All Students |
MET |
MET 100% |
MET |
MET 97.89% |
|
American Indian/Alaska Native |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Asian or Pacific Islander |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
White, Not Hispanic |
MET |
MET 100% |
MET |
MET 87.73% |
|
Black, Not Hispanic |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Hispanic |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Students eligible for free and reduced lunch |
MET |
MET 100% |
MET |
MET 96.34% |
|
Special Education Students |
~ |
~ |
MET |
MET 93.88% |
|
English Language Learners |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Student Performance: Mathematics 4th Grade
|
|
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
||
|
Student Groups |
Performance |
Participation |
Performance |
Participation |
|
All Students |
MET |
MET 100% |
MET |
MET 97.91% |
|
American Indian/Alaska Native |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Asian or Pacific Islander |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
White, Not Hispanic |
MET |
MET 100% |
MET |
MET 97.74% |
|
Black, Not Hispanic |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Hispanic |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Students eligible for free and reduced lunch |
MET |
MET 100% |
MET |
MET 96.34% |
|
Special Education Students |
~ |
~ |
NOT MET |
NOT MET 91.84% |
|
English Language Learners |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Student Performance: Writing 4th Grade
|
Grade |
Percent of Broken Bow Students Taking Assessment |
Statewide Average Students Meeting or Exceeding Standards
|
Broken Bow Students Meeting or Exceeding Standards |
|
4 |
100% |
82% |
93% |
Student Performance: Reading 8th Grade
|
|
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
||
|
Student Groups |
Performance |
Participation |
Performance |
Participation |
|
All Students |
MET |
MET 100% |
MET |
MET 97.85% |
|
American Indian/Alaska Native |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Asian or Pacific Islander |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
White, Not Hispanic |
MET |
MET 100% |
MET |
MET 98.31% |
|
Black, Not Hispanic |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Hispanic |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Students eligible for free and reduced lunch |
~ |
~ |
MET |
MET 98.31% |
|
Special Education Students |
~ |
~ |
MET |
MET 97.22% |
|
English Language Learners |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Student Performance: Mathematics 8th Grade
|
|
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
||
|
Student Groups |
Performance |
Participation |
Performance |
Participation |
|
All Students |
MET |
MET 100% |
MET |
MET 95.16% |
|
American Indian/Alaska Native |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Asian or Pacific Islander |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
White, Not Hispanic |
MET |
MET 100% |
MET |
MET 94.92% |
|
Black, Not Hispanic |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Hispanic |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Students eligible for free and reduced lunch |
MET |
MET 100% |
MET |
MET 100% |
|
Special Education Students |
~ |
~ |
MET |
MET 94.44% |
|
English Language Learners |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Student Performance: Writing 8th Grade
|
Grade |
Percent of Broken Bow Students Taking Assessment |
Statewide Average Students Meeting or Exceeding Standards
|
Broken Bow Students Meeting or Exceeding Standards |
|
8 |
100% |
86% |
79% |
Student Performance: Reading 11th Grade
|
|
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
||
|
Student Groups |
Performance |
Participation |
Performance |
Participation |
|
All Students |
MET |
MET 100% |
MET |
MET 95.52% |
|
American Indian/Alaska Native |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Asian or Pacific Islander |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
White, Not Hispanic |
MET |
MET 100% |
MET |
MET 95.52% |
|
Black, Not Hispanic |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Hispanic |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Students eligible for free and reduced lunch |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
|
Special Education Students |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
English Language Learners |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Student Performance: Mathematics 11th Grade
|
|
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
||
|
Student Groups |
Performance |
Participation |
Performance |
Participation |
|
All Students |
MET |
MET 100% |
MET |
MET 97.01% |
|
American Indian/Alaska Native |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Asian or Pacific Islander |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
White, Not Hispanic |
MET |
MET 100% |
MET |
MET 97.01% |
|
Black, Not Hispanic |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Hispanic |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Students eligible for free and reduced lunch |
~ |
~ |
~ |
~ |
|
Special Education Students |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
English Language Learners |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Student Performance: Writing 11th Grade
|
Grade |
Percent of Broken Bow Students Taking Assessment |
Statewide Average Students Meeting or Exceeding Standards
|
Broken Bow Students Meeting or Exceeding Standards |
|
11 |
97% |
90% |
86% |
PART IV
BROKEN BOW CLASS OF 2006
Exit Survey Results
From 74 Students
1. What areas do you plan to pursue after high school?
Graduates to attend 2-year school 23 or 31.1%
Voc/Tech School 7 or 9.5%
Work Full Time 5 or 6.8%
Work Part Time 11 or 14.9%
Apprenticeship 0
Military 3 or 4.1%
Other 6 or 8.1%
(Percentage may exceed 100% as seniors can mark multiple responses)
2. Were school counselors helpful in the selection of a path to follow after graduation?
YES = 83.8% NO = 16.2%
3. Did school make learning exciting and encourage you to continue your education?
YES = 45.9% NO = 54.1%
4. Were enough elective classes offered for you to explore different career opportunities?
YES = 47.3% NO = 52.7%
5. Would you recommend Broken Bow High School to others?
YES = 81.1% NO = 18.9%
6. Do you feel the community supported BBHS as a quality school?
YES = 95.9% NO = 4.1%
7. Did you have a positive learning experience at Broken Bow High School?
YES = 78.4% NO = 21.6%
8. Did your teachers generally hold high standards and demand quality work?
Excellent = 12.2% Good = 62.2%
Average = 24.3% Below Average = 1.4%
9. Do you feel Broken Bow High School provided a safe and drug free environment?
Excellent = 14.9% Good = 35.1%
Average = 28.4% Below Average = 12.2%
Needs Improvement 9.5%
10. Do you feel fully prepared for the transition to college or the workplace?
11. Did Broken Bow High School provide you a strong foundation in the use of technology?
Excellent = 16.2% Good = 35.1%
Average = 35.1% Below Average = 9.5%
Needs Improvement = 2.7% No Response = 1.4%
12. Were core classes meaningful and meet an educational need for your future?
Excellent = 13.5% Good = 47.3%
Average = 28.4% Below Average = 6.8%
Needs Improvement = 2.7% No Response = 1.4%
13. Do you feel Broken Bow High School offered challenging courses?
Excellent = 14.9% Good = 47.3%
Average = 29.7% Below Average = 6.8%
Needs Improvement = 2.7%
14. Overall, how well did the staff care about you?
Excellent = 29.7% Good = 41.9%
Average = 13.5% Below Average = 6.8%
Needs Improvement = 8.1%
15. Were the administrators and office staff helpful when needed?
Excellent = 31.3% Good = 43.2%
Average = 14.9% Below Average = 5.4%
Needs Improvement = 5.4%
16. Were the expectations for the student conduct appropriate?
Excellent = 18.9% Good = 40.5%
Average = 28.4% Below Average = 5.4%
Needs Improvement – 5.4% No Response = 1.4%